Raze Security
AI Governance

AI Security

Use AI safely and protect your enterprise data

As organizations adopt generative AI, they face new risks such as Prompt Injection, enterprise data leakage and Shadow AI usage. We anchor your AI strategy in a secure framework, test your LLMs against modern attack techniques, and design technical guardrails that prevent your corporate secrets from leaking into training data.

Audit and Compliance: This service delivers a technical security assessment aligned with the EU AI Act, OWASP Top 10 for LLM and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework.

Service Scope

End-to-end protection from models to data flows

We audit your AI ecosystem grounded in the OWASP Top 10 for LLM standards.

LLM Red Teaming and Exploitation

We test your models and RAG/Agent applications from an offensive perspective.

  • •Prompt Injection: Hijacking control of the model with direct and indirect attacks.
  • •Sensitive Data Leakage: Access to secrets in training data and RAG databases.
  • •Model Poisoning: Analysis of backdoor insertion through fine-tuning data.

Enterprise Data Leakage (DLP)

The impact of employees' AI usage habits on data security.

  • •Shadow AI Discovery: Detection and risk mapping of unauthorized AI tools.
  • •AI DLP: Detection of code and strategic documents shared with ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini.
  • •Usage Policy: A safe AI guide and governance model tailored to your organization.

AI Infrastructure and API Security

Audit of the technology layers on which AI models run.

  • •Vector DB: Unauthorized access and injection in Pinecone, Milvus and Weaviate.
  • •AI API: Authorization and rate-limiting of model API endpoints.
  • •Plugin Risks: Analysis of plugins that connect the model to the internet or internal network.

Methodology

AI Security Framework

A structured, repeatable, outcome-driven process grounded in the OWASP Top 10 for LLM and NIST AI RMF frameworks, protecting your corporate secrets from leaking into training data.

01

Risk Profiling

We map the organization's AI use cases and data lineage end to end.

02

Attack-Driven Testing

We run targeted Red Teaming against LLM models and applications using OWASP-based scenarios.

03

Technical Protection (Guardrails)

We design input/output filtering mechanisms and "Prompt Firewall" solutions tailored to your organization.

04

Compliance and Ethics Review

We technically validate your compliance with the EU AI Act and local data protection laws (KVKK/GDPR).

Delivery

A security architecture that protects both the model and the data

At the end of the AI security audit we deliver both a technical protection guide and concrete recommendations for organizational policy.

  • Prompt Injection & Jailbreak Report: For every model tested: successful attack scenarios and PoC evidence.
  • Guardrails Guide: Input/output filtering and "Prompt Firewall" configuration recommendations.
  • Shadow AI & Governance: AI usage risks across your network and safe-usage policies.
Next Step

Let's design the AI security assessment scope together

Scope & Proposal

Attack scenarios and risk assessment tailored to your LLM applications, RAG architectures and MLOps surface.

Get a quote

OWASP LLM Top 10 Expertise

Certified specialists in prompt injection, training-data poisoning and model extraction assessments.

View certifications

Compliance Frameworks

Details under EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 obligations.

Explore frameworks
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What types of AI systems do you test?

The end-to-end AI stack including LLM-based applications, RAG architectures, chatbots, ML APIs and on-prem model deployments.

Which frameworks do you use in the audit?

OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS and NIST AI RMF. Findings are mapped to these frameworks in the report.

Is prompt injection really a critical risk?

Yes. Through model-connected tools (tool calling), RAG sources and automation chains it can turn into data exfiltration and unauthorized actions. It is one of the main focuses of our testing.

Is our data safe during testing?

Yes. Tests run within the agreed scope under NDA. Data leakage scenarios are validated with controlled evidence, without exposing real data.

Do you also assess our AI usage from a privacy perspective?

Yes. Personal data flows into the model, anonymization and transparency obligations are addressed alongside the technical audit.